------------------------------ Content-Type: text/plain Loopers-Delight-d Digest Volume 96 : Issue 33 Today's Topics: Re: BIO-ELECTRONIC ? [ pycraft@elec.gla.ac.uk (Dr ) ] Re: Re[2]: Vortex Applications Notes [ Paolo Valladolid ] Re: FS: stick [ Anton Chovit ] Re: Vortex features? [ Anton Chovit ] Re: Vortex features? [ JOHNPOLLOCK@delphi.com ] Digitech Whammy pedal [ David.Orton@mail.bl.uk (David Orton ] Re: Vortex features? [ pycraft@elec.gla.ac.uk (Dr ) ] Re[2]: Vortex features? [ "Todd Madson" ] Re: Vortex features? [ "T.W. Hartnett" ] Re: Vortex features? [ KILLINFO@aol.com ] Re: implied rhythms [ Paolo Valladolid ] Re: VG8 with Ebow? [ patrick@his.com (Patrick Smith) ] Re: VG8 with Ebow? [ "T.W. Hartnett" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Well, your nickname Dr called my atention, and I not just like >englishmen, usually, I'm Welsh, but that's a different story! > but especially those sincere ones and the name PYCRAFT >sounds like someone really special It's my mother's maiden name, and does seem quite rare. >and the Zen Proverb is a extremely interesting one... ... and used as a good excuse for Zen masters to get drunk occasionally, apparently. >but, I'm afraid, what really makes me risk to rob some >of your time is: BIO-ELECTRONIC - What the hell... ?? >I imagine you implant RS 232 into rats to monitor them... or make chips >cross their legs and then procreate... "Lift your leg, Ratty." "Come on, Ratty, lift your leg!" "Ok, if that's the way you want it..." ZAP!! "Good boy, Ratty!" Naaah, I spend my day using electric fields to manipulate viruses on microelectrode arrays. It can be a great conversation killer, especially when people find out that the main virus I use is Herpes. Yes, I spend all day looking at Herpes move down a microscope. There's a bit more about it on my web page (http://www.elec.gla.ac.uk/~pycraft/) >If anyone thinks this is off topic: shht, he is Dr., lets see whether we >can finally find the resonance centre in the brain, you know, the >twistplace, the ANSWER to the loop... If we knew the answer to the loop there would be no point asking the question anymore, and that would be a shame. Michael Dr Michael Pycraft Hughes Bioelectronic Research Centre, Rankine Bldg, Tel: (+44) 141 330 5979 University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K. "Everything in moderation, including moderation" (Zen Proverb) ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 10:07:07 -0800 (PST) From: Paolo Valladolid To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Re[2]: Vortex Applications Notes Message-Id: <199612101807.KAA08452@waynesworld.ucsd.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Another possibility: How long will it be before this Pentium 133 I'm > using (which came with *two* MIDI sequencer programs and WAV audio > software) shrinks to palmtop size, for a third of the price--and I can > design my own looper, morphing FX, etc.? > > John Email: johnpollock@delphi.com > Troubador Tech on the Web--http://people.delphi.com/johnpollock/ With today's technology, Pat Metheny is already using his laptop (one of the Power Macs) as a digital 8-track recorder for demos with, I think, an Opcode Studio Vision/Quicktime instruments software setup. I hope Opcode will produce a next-generation Max that is as powerful as the Silicon Graphics version which has better support for real-time DSP objects, etc. Paolo Valladolid ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Moderator of Digital Guitar Digest, an Internet mailing list |\ |for Music Technology and Stringed Instruments | \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- | \ finger pvallado@waynesworld.ucsd.edu for more info \ | \ http://waynesworld.ucsd.edu/DigitalGuitar/home.html \| ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Dec 96 12:13:43 CST From: "Todd Madson" To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com, ToddM@lasermaster.com Subject: Re[2]: Echoplex system version? Message-Id: <9611108502.AA850248788@ccmailgate.LaserMaster.Com> Travis: Where did you buy your plex? Todd Madson. _______________________________________________________________________________ Subject: Re: Echoplex system version? From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com at Internet Date: 12/6/96 4:24 PM >Message was resent -- Original recipients were: To: "Looper's Delight" ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------- >what is the going price of the echoplex these days? > >paul I just ordered one this week, and $549 for the 12.5 second configuration was the standard. The footpedal runs about $100. Travis Hartnett Received: from spica.LaserMaster.Com by ccmailgate.LaserMaster.Com (SMTPLINK V2.10.08) ; Fri, 06 Dec 96 16:23:51 CST Return-Path: Received: from ferret.slip.net (ferret.slip.net [204.160.88.6]) by spica.LaserMaster.Com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA17261 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 16:33:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from lists by ferret.slip.net with local (Exim 0.57 #1) id 0vW8jJ-0007NY-00; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 14:26:49 -0800 Message-Id: <199612062225.OAA21306@scv1.apple.com> Subject: Re: Echoplex system version? Date: Sat, 7 Dec 96 04:25:47 -0000 x-sender: hartne.t@mail.apple.com x-mailer: Claris Emailer 1.1 From: "T.W. Hartnett" To: "Looper's Delight" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Resent-Message-ID: <"OEuD0D.A.SyG.C1Jqy"@ferret> Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1313 X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: SmartList Resent-To: ToddM@lasermaster.com Resent-Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 14:26:49 -0800 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 20:41:48 -0500 From: Paulpop@ssnet.com (Paul Poplawski, Phd) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Bon Reminder Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >PMimlitsch@aol.com writes: >>Bon Lazaga will be performing solo (lots of looping goin' on) this Thurs. >>night Dec. 12th at the "Down to Earth Coffeehouse" in Mt. Holly, New Jersey. >> Start time 8:00pm, cover charge-$5.00. Call (609)265-9135 for >>info/directions etc. > >If anyone tapes this, please contact me directly. Accidents will Happen will be performing in Newark Delaware this saturday at Jam'n Java ... a three piece improvisational group ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 96 15:35:41 +1100 From: DAVID_MITCHELL@HP-Australia-om1.om.hp.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Vortex features? Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="Vortex" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit G'day everyone, As a new arrival to the list, I've been waiting for someone to list the Vortex features, but it hasn't happened over the last few weeks... It sounds like what I want, the price is certainly right at the moment and Xmas is coming up; could someone please list out the features and/or any user experiences? If this is in a FAQ or on a web site somewhere, just point me to the place. Thanks in advance Dave Mitchell ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:24:55 -0700 (MST) From: Dan Howarth To: stickwire-l@netcom.com cc: loopers-delight@annihilist.com Subject: FS: stick Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII hi folks, i'm selling my stick. (still trying, i guess i should say... i've had no replies yet). please contact me (not the list) if you're interested. **************************************************************** ** Dan Howarth, History/Music, University of Arizona, Tucson ** ** http://www.u.arizona.edu/~howarth (under construction) ** **************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 23:37:52 +0000 From: Anton Chovit To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: FS: stick Message-ID: <32ADF450.220B@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hey Dan, I still don't want to buy your stick. Sorry! ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:13:21 +0000 From: Anton Chovit To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Vortex features? Message-ID: <32ADFC9C.2D03@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey there mate! As one who just purchased a vortex, I will try to describe my first impressions. To preface, I must say that I demoed one of these a year or so ago and was totally unimpressed. I couldn't get it to sound good for anything at the music store with someone else's setup (and a guitar I didn't like). This summer my brother bought a unit and has been doing some really incredible things with it. So I finaly broke down and got one. =20 FIRST IMPRESSIONS OF A VORTEX =95It is weird. =95Not like other effects. =95The presets suck without tweeking (especially the MIX parameter) and proper stereo set-up. =95The interface is actually simple and somewhat intuitive: Since I am used to completely unintuitive, awkward interfaces like an R8M or a DX7 it took me a while to realize this. =95With tweeking, it is capable of some of the coolest sounds are I have ever created. =95Can sound like a complete pedal effect layout gone quite crazy. Way more interesting than the typical DDL/reverb/multi effects I've used. =95Then I tried morphing; Whoa!! I've never done that before! =95Next I plugged-in an expression pedal and things got really twisted. =95Between morphing and the real time expresion pedal control, I know of no equal effect unit. (I've used an ART SGX2000 with the x-15 MIDI controller w/expression control, etc., but that is apples to oranges) =95Sounds like an orchestral mix between simultaneous envelope filters, delays, and modulating flange & chourus effects. =95Allows me to play the effect as much as/(and as if it were) the instrument(s) =95This is going to take a long time to figure out. =95This is going to be fun to use for a long time! =95Bottom Line #1:For $150 what do you want? THIS THING ROCKS!!!!! =95Bottom Line #2:I want another one. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 03:18:54 -0500 (EST) From: JOHNPOLLOCK@delphi.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Vortex features? Message-id: <01ICVAM05PRI95SNFD@delphi.com> Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Dave Mitchell wrote, >As a new arrival to the list, I've been waiting for someone to list the >Vortex features, but it hasn't happened over the last few weeks... Dave, here's the condensed version: The Lexicon Vortex is a stereo-capable signal processor which includes a pair of delays, a pair of modulators, and an envelope follower, which can be configured in a variety of ways. It stores 16 pairs of factory patches and 16 user-programmable patch pairs. What makes it totally different from most other processors is its capacity to "morph" between the two patches in each pair, either with an expression pedal or by programming a morph duration (which can be up to ten seconds) and using a footswitch. Some seriously twisted things can happen during the morph, and the envelope follower can make things even stranger. The two delays can be cascaded for a total maximum delay time of 1.846 seconds; tempo can be tapped in with a footswitch; and it can be configured as a looping sampler. It can also be used more conventionally, with flanger, chorus, tremolo, and rotary speaker effects combined with delays in various ways. Since I've had mine for only a short time, I'm certainly no authority. You can read the same user reports that seduced me into buying mine at http://www.annihilist.com/loop/archive/filtered/Vortex.html along with some cautionary tales from Vortex purchasers outside the USA. John Email: johnpollock@delphi.com Troubador Tech on the Web--http://people.delphi.com/johnpollock/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 12:31:02 +0000 From: David.Orton@mail.bl.uk (David Orton) To: Subject: Digitech Whammy pedal Message-ID: <2AEAB980.1424@mail.bl.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part Calling all loopers Does anyone out there have an experience good or bad with the Whammy Pedal? It appears to be something I could use, but just a shade expensive in the UK. I'm mainly concerned with sound quality. Do its harmonisations `warble' (as my Zoom pedal already does!) or is it (relatively) stable? Cheers David ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 13:23:24 GMT From: pycraft@elec.gla.ac.uk (Dr ) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Vortex features? Message-Id: <8467.199612111323@rank-serv.elec.gla.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I've asked this before. About 3 times. Please, _someone_ answer! How do you change patches on the Vortex if it doesn't have MIDI? If it's supposedly a performance-based processor how do you change patches during performance? Is it just by up/down pedals, or what??? Michael Dr Michael Pycraft Hughes Bioelectronic Research Centre, Rankine Bldg, Tel: (+44) 141 330 5979 University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K. "Everything in moderation, including moderation" (Zen Proverb) ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 96 09:39:37 CST From: "Todd Madson" To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com, ToddM@lasermaster.com Subject: Re[2]: Vortex features? Message-Id: <9611118503.AA850325900@ccmailgate.LaserMaster.Com> Hey: > I've asked this before. About 3 times. Please, _someone_ answer! Really? I don't remember. Sorry. > How do you change patches on the Vortex if it doesn't have MIDI? If it's > supposedly a performance-based processor how do you change patches during > performance? Is it just by up/down pedals, or what??? The unit has jacks for momentary footswitches. One footswitch comes with the unit. The one I have set-up has the A footswitch set to morph from A to B on a given patch. The B footswitch is set to be the tap tempo delay footswitch. The other jack allows for another two button footswitch. One allows for advancing upwards in patches (i.e. from 0 to 16). The other allows for bypass of the unit altogether. How do you play it in a performance situation? Well, I have a patch for effect #2 on the unit so that A and B are two different sounds - I use the A patch for clean rhythm sounds and solo sounds, and the B patch I use with various delay times for clean drone or synth type sounds for guitar. If I need chorus (10) or doubling (8) I walk over to my rack between tunes and set it there - kind of unweildy so far. I do not yet have a second footswitch for advancing through the presets, although that will come since, as I said, it is unweildy. There's also a way-cool jack that allows you to control the channel switching of your amplifier (or preamp or whatever) just by moving from A to B - that's very cool. I can press one footswitch and have my pre-amp move from rhythm to lead and simultaneously set the vortex to move to a sound appropriate for it. I also need an expression pedal - I'm looking at the rolls as being the most economical. I'd also love a second vortex before they vanish from the face of the earth since my ART SGE is now pretty much defunct (all the digital stuff blew up when my lil' studio got a lightning hit, everything else was fine - but it makes a horrid 60hz sound now). Todd Madson. Return-Path: Received: from ferret.slip.net (ferret.slip.net [204.160.88.6]) by spica.LaserMaster.Com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA08828 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 07:30:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from lists by ferret.slip.net with local (Exim 0.57 #1) id 0vXodY-0005Zm-00; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 05:23:48 -0800 Message-Id: <8467.199612111323@rank-serv.elec.gla.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 13:23:24 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com From: pycraft@elec.gla.ac.uk (Dr ) Subject: Re: Vortex features? Resent-Message-ID: <"iGHOkB.A.2KF.zWrry"@ferret> Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1379 X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: SmartList Resent-To: ToddM@lasermaster.com Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 05:23:48 -0800 ------------------------------ Date: 11 Dec 96 11:04:20 EST From: Jon Durant <74074.1316@CompuServe.COM> To: "INTERNET:Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com" Subject: Re: Vortex features? Message-ID: <961211160419_74074.1316_GHQ106-1@CompuServe.COM> Michael pleads: >How do you change patches on the Vortex if it doesn't have MIDI? If it's >supposedly a performance-based processor how do you change patches during >performance? Is it just by up/down pedals, or what??? I thought someone *had* answered, but maybe I dreamt it. Anyway, there are up/down pedals for changing programs. You have the ability to store your sounds in any register you want, and you can "clear" a register, so that you set up a chain of effects (1-2-3; 5-6-7-8; etc.--thus avoiding having to scroll though all 16 registers in a given bank). Also the A/B (bank/morph) switch also has the added bonus of sending a relay off to a channel switching amp. This, I know, has been commented on earlier. Also: I don't know the final status of this, but at one point Digital Music Corp (Ground Control MIDI foot controller) and Lex had discussed a special set of software for the Ground Control that would have specific JamMan commands, and also sent analog switching off to the Vortex. I don't know if it ever evolved, but someone out there might have heard. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 10:29:39 -0600 From: John Ott To: "'Loopers Delight'" Subject: Vortex link, First post Message-ID: Hello Loopers Just joined the list. Got my Jamman and an Ebow delivered from Musicians Friend last night. (stayed up way too late) Here is a Vortex link I came accross while researching the Jamman: http://www.harmony-central.com/Effects/Data/Lexicon/Vortex-spec.html Jamman link is: http://www.harmony-central.com/Effects/Data/Lexicon/JamMan-spec.html Later John ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 96 23:35:03 -0000 From: "T.W. Hartnett" To: "Looper's Delight" Subject: Re: Vortex features? Message-Id: <199612111734.JAA13648@scv2.apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" >I've asked this before. About 3 times. Please, _someone_ answer! > >How do you change patches on the Vortex if it doesn't have MIDI? If it's >supposedly a performance-based processor how do you change patches during >performance? Is it just by up/down pedals, or what??? There are two ways to change patches on the Vortex, either by turning the knob on the front panel, or connecting a momentary-contact switch to the back panel. With the momentary switch (Lexicon includes a flimsy one with the Vortex, which can also be used to switch between the A and B presets in each patch), you can increment up the patch number, once with each press of the switch. It rolls over at 16, going back to 1. There's no way to increment down. For performance purposes, I prefer to keep an expression pedal connected, which allows me to morph between the A and B presets dynamically. If I want to switch patches, I use my hand. Travis Hartnett ------------------------------ Date: 11 Dec 96 12:33:14 EST From: Michael Peters <100041.247@CompuServe.COM> To: Subject: Vortex features? Message-ID: <961211173314_100041.247_JHB106-2@CompuServe.COM> hi Dave, > could someone please list out the features and/or any user experiences? > If this is in a FAQ or on a web site somewhere, just point me to the > place. check out the Looper's Delight website - there are collections of previous posts, one collection containing nothing but Vortex related messages (up to end of October I think). -Michael ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 13:03:17 -0500 (EST) From: Eric Cook To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Digitech Whammy pedal Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 11 Dec 1996, David Orton wrote: > Calling all loopers > > Does anyone out there have an experience good or bad with the Whammy > Pedal? > > It appears to be something I could use, but just a shade expensive in > the UK. I'm mainly concerned with sound quality. Do its harmonisations > `warble' (as my Zoom pedal already does!) or is it (relatively) > stable? David -- I don't use one, but the guitarist that I play with does. It's been useful for us. Some of the higher range of pitchshifting (say, from a little above 1 octave, up to 2 octaves) is a bit warbly, but not digustingly so (and once you get up to 2 octaves, pretty much anything you play sounds silly anyway :) Pitchshifting down, and the harmonization effects are cleaner. Oh, and the Whammy II does seem to have a cleaner sound than the original model. That, and an input gain control make it the better choice of the two. (Not sure if you can even find the 1st version anymore, in any case.) Haven't heard the Zoom pedal, so I can't make a relative comparison between the two. --Eric Cook ecook@mail.msen.com Gravitar-Guy http://www.msen.com/~ecook/gravitar.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 16:27:10 -0500 From: KILLINFO@aol.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Vortex features? Message-ID: <961211153840_1388477009@emout07.mail.aol.com> Michael, You wrote > How do you change patches on the Vortex if it doesn't > have MIDI? If it's supposedly a performance-based > processor how do you change patches during performance? > Is it just by up/down pedals, or what??? Yes, that's essentially it (other than an EV-5 or some such pedal that allows for "morphing" between effects pairs). That and the front panel knob are al you've got on a Vortex. Ted ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:43:56 -0800 (PST) From: Paolo Valladolid To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: implied rhythms Message-Id: <199612112243.OAA21046@waynesworld.ucsd.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I maybe must say something of little respect: Its time to go way beyond > Fripp in terms of looping! I said that to himself, too: A part of a long > letter I wrote over a year ago was: > > ...until I found the Soundscapes CD at the beginning of this year. > Listening to it, I felt the desire to contact you: I learned so much about > guitar playing and music from you, mainly in the 70's, and I am still a > rather limited musician. But now, I have developed the looping way of > playing to a degree, where I could teach you something, too - about the > technology of the machine and its musical applications. > > He never answered. Maybe I was not delicate enough or did not understand > his record. Or he and his disciples stick to what has been found, just the > same way as many stick to Strat-Marsh music as developped by Hendrix... He was probably offended by the "I could teach you something" part. I've seen this happen in the taijiquan (martial art) community with instructors who think they know everything there is to know and greet any notion that there is still a thing or two to learn with affrontery and denial. I'm hardly a bigshot but you folks on this list have really opened my eyes about making music with loops. Paolo Valladolid ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Moderator of Digital Guitar Digest, an Internet mailing list |\ |for Music Technology and Stringed Instruments | \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- | \ finger pvallado@waynesworld.ucsd.edu for more info \ | \ http://waynesworld.ucsd.edu/DigitalGuitar/home.html \| ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 15:52:45 -0800 (PST) From: Neil Goldstein To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: VG8 with Ebow? Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Anybody use an Ebow on a VG8? Wonder how it works since the pickup is the piezo hex one rather than magnetic. I just joined the list 2 weeks ago and couldn't resist getting a Vortex and am very happy with it. Thanks to all for the "references". Wide timbral range with the VG8, should provide enough to explore through the millenium! Neil ngold@teleport.com Portland, OR USA ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 18:29:26 +0200 From: patrick@his.com (Patrick Smith) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: VG8 with Ebow? Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Anybody use an Ebow on a VG8? Wonder how it works since the pickup is the >piezo hex one rather than magnetic. > Well I don't know about the VG-8 , buut the e-bow works fine on the piezo's on my Ovation 1867. Not as responsive nor as much fun as magnetic pickups, but it does drives the string. Patrick ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Dec 96 06:29:33 -0000 From: "T.W. Hartnett" To: "Looper's Delight" Subject: Re: VG8 with Ebow? Message-Id: <199612120029.QAA76374@scv1.apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" >>Anybody use an Ebow on a VG8? Wonder how it works since the pickup is the >>piezo hex one rather than magnetic. >> > > >Well I don't know about the VG-8 , buut the e-bow works fine on the piezo's >on my Ovation 1867. Not as responsive nor as much fun as magnetic pickups, >but it does drives the string. I don't think it's the type of pickup that determines the responsiveness, but rather the type of string. Regular acoustic strings have a lower magnetic content, and aren't as agitated by the Ebow. If you put a set of regular eletric guitar strings on your acoustic, it'd be as responsive as your electric. Travis Hartnett ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 02:31:38 -0500 (EST) From: JOHNPOLLOCK@delphi.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: VG8 with Ebow? Message-id: <01ICWN8SNROY9890HK@delphi.com> Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT >>>Anybody use an Ebow on a VG8? Wonder how it works since the pickup is the >>>piezo hex one rather than magnetic. >>Well I don't know about the VG-8 , buut the e-bow works fine on the piezo's >>on my Ovation 1867. Not as responsive nor as much fun as magnetic pickups, >>but it does drives the string. >I don't think it's the type of pickup that determines the responsiveness, >but rather the type of string. Regular acoustic strings have a lower >magnetic content, and aren't as agitated by the Ebow. If you put a set >of regular eletric guitar strings on your acoustic, it'd be as responsive >as your electric. I agree with Travis, but suggest stainless steel strings rather than regular nickel or monel electric strings. Stainless steel is much brighter, lasts a lot longer, and yields an acoustic sound that is much more acceptable to my ear. YMMV... John Email: johnpollock@delphi.com Troubador Tech on the Web--http://people.delphi.com/johnpollock/ --------------------------------