------------------------------ Loopers-Delight-d Digest Volume 97 : Issue 153 Today's Topics: Re: Echoplex upgrade [ Kim Flint ] Re: looping voice ideas [ Kim Flint ] R: FS VORTEX [ "Stefano Voulaz" ] Re: looping voice ideas [ Leonardo Cavallo ] ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Messag [ nm@mail.amsinc.com (ccMail SMTPLINK ] more questions [ Erik Ljones ] Echoplex Questionnaire results -- so [ David Kirkdorffer ] Echoplex DP Overdub Problem [ Arthur Gatesy ] RE: Torn suggestions [ "Ott, John" ] RE: Torn suggestions [ "Joseph Buck" ] Info on Echoplex upgrade availabilit [ "Paul J. Dresher" ] Re: Echoplex DP Overdub Problem [ Arthur Gatesy ] Studio Quad [ "The Negative Eye" To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Echoplex upgrade Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Roland said: >Kim or anyone... > >I just acquired a used plex...and on power up the software version shows >3.0 >Is there any problem upgrading to the new v 5.0? or do I have to acquire >3.2 first? you can go straight to 5.0, no need for 3.2. >Can anyone confirm that Gibson has these upgrades in stock and ready to >ship? I'm not sure if the customer service people have them ready in Nashville. They were supposed to have them ready by now, so if they don't they are very close. I know they were programming a big lot of chips a couple of weeks ago for it. Call them to check or put your order in, 510-635-9633. (that's actually an Oakland number but it should automatically redirect you to OB customer service in Nashville.) There is also an 800 number, 800-279-4346, probably goes to the same place. > >Also..and I know this has been answered before probably but, as far as >upgrading >memory goes...is there any problem using 4x9 (parity) 30 pin simms (60 >ns)? no problem, that should be fine. 4x8, 4x9, parity, non-parity, 2 chips, 3 chips; all should work. >(is it possible for any older device to have architecture too slow to >keep up with >newer faster memory chips?)...Seems like all I can find are these newer >60ns parity chips...about $80 bucks for 16 megs on four simms...is that >a decent price? sounds like a good price to me. >will these new fast chips work appreciably better than some older 100 ns >3 chip non parity simms? I KNOW there must be some used or NOS 30 pin >simms out there >but I aint finding them. They should work the same. If some dealer ever tries to sell you special "echoplex" simms, or simms in "matched pairs," or any sort of simm that is claimed to produce better quality audio and therefore is more expensive, please laugh at him for me. Then tell him he is an idiot. kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@annihilist.com | http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html http://www.annihilist.com/ | Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 23:41:23 -0700 From: Kim Flint To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: looping voice ideas Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 12:51 AM -0400 9/15/97, Russell Gorton wrote: >4) I like looping tv voices and playing them backwards. Classic ambient >technique...nothing like good old backwards play! It worked for the >Beatles AND Judas Priest! Hey! We didn't put reverse in there so you could easily make satanic records like those evil heavy metal bands, why I......oh, wait....yes that is why we put reverse in there. never mind.... ;-) hmm, wonder where my Slayer records are..... kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@annihilist.com | http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html http://www.annihilist.com/ | Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 10:37:19 +0200 From: "Stefano Voulaz" To: Subject: R: FS VORTEX Message-Id: <19970915103642.0d8463bc.in@mail.korg.it> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Bruce! Interested in selling your Vortex to Italy? I'm looking for one, but here is VERY hard to find... Please let me know. Ciao! Stefano (The Uncle) 8^)# ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 15:06:57 +0200 From: Leonardo Cavallo To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: looping voice ideas Message-ID: <19970915130655046.AAB166@Default> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi all Some days ago I've suggested to my singer to try out a pedal effects chain (boss type) VS a rack mounted iper mega ultra clean studio enhanced effect. For radical use there's no better. And suggesting him to add a digital delay/reverb (from boss, don't remember the name) with 2 secs of looping capabilities to his distortion, flanger, etc. pedals, I've opened him the door to a whole new universe. He just phoned me with enthustiastic words while a dense, growing voice loop was running through his house stereo system. What a satisfaction.... ciao leo PS any news for updated EUROplexes??? ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 97 11:55:33 EST From: nm@mail.amsinc.com (ccMail SMTPLINK) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message Message-Id: <9708148742.AA874263333@mail.amsinc.com> Message undeliverable at this time Original text follows ---------------------------------------------- Received: from ams.amsinc.com by mail.amsinc.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) ; Sun, 14 Sep 97 11:55:30 EST Return-Path: Received: from ferret (ferret.slip.net) by ams.amsinc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA15993; Sun, 14 Sep 97 12:01:54 EDT Received: from lists by ferret with local (Exim 1.62 #4) id 0xAH14-0003wZ-00; Sun, 14 Sep 1997 08:55:18 -0700 Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970914114821.0069fc34@popmail.voicenet.com> X-Sender: floyd@popmail.voicenet.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 11:48:21 -0400 To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com From: Floyd Miller Subject: Re: New software In-Reply-To: References: <970912073031_1795682208@emout05.mail.aol.com> Resent-Message-Id: <"Uw7KI.A.RoD.KiAH0"@ferret> Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/510 Precedence: list Resent-Sender: SmartList Resent-To: Edward_Chang@mail.amsinc.com Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 08:55:18 -0700 At 10:31 PM 9/13/97 -0700, Kim wrote: > >Since I'm going to the trouble, anything specific you would like to have in >the upgrade docs? > Yes - where to get the upgrade, user-installable. **************** ********** Floyd Miller ****** floyd@voicenet.com ** http://www.voicenet.com/~floyd ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 15:17:02 +0200 From: Erik Ljones To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: more questions Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970915151702.00729768@pop.stud.ntnu.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Could someone please pick up a copy of Robert Fripps Radiophonics soundscape, and tell what is going on on track #5? I kind of like it. Saw an add for a jamman the other day. Is bying it a good idea when I'm already getting an Echoplex? Do these units work well together? I'm not really in a hurry, so I was wondering if waiting for another Echoplex to come by is a better thing to do? How is syncronization of the units done in these two cases? Also, I'm under the impression that the music of David Torn is worth checking out. Could someone please recomend a good starting point? Thanks. Erik Ljones (Norway) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 10:06:23 -0400 From: David Kirkdorffer To: "'Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com'" Subject: Echoplex Questionnaire results -- soon! Message-ID: <30C4F9E5EBE1D0118B760000C0DD100F0486D2@MAIL> Content-Type: text/plain Hello from questionnaire tabulation central. And thank you to the 48 who responded to the Echoplex DP questionnaire I submitted on Thursday. Now, I promised to post the results today - but after spending quite a bit of time on it this weekend, I'm going to ask your indulgence of a day or two more so I can finish what I've started - I'm so close to done! What's causing the delay is I've tried to write a report deliverable to managers at Gibson. The sample of 48 cases is quite small, so the study can only be fairly used to indicate trends. However, let me lay on you a few findings, just to give you an idea of what can be gleaned. A. Looper Device Market Penetration I'll let the chart speak for itself Q5a. Please list the other Loopers you own? No. Devices % Devices Owned Owned Oberheim Echoplex DP 13 14.6 All Lexicon Total 47 52.8 All Digitech Total 11 12.4 All Eventide Total 5 5.6 All Boss Total 2 2.2 All Other Total 11 12.4 Grand Total 89 100.0 Number of Devices Owned Percent of Owned Loopers Oberheim Echoplex DP 13 14.6 All Lexicon Total 47 52.8 All Digitech Total 11 12.4 All Eventide Total 5 5.6 All Boss Total 2 2.2 All Other Total 11 12.4 Grand Total 89 100.0 And separately, Looking at the 23 JamMan owners, 9 (39.1%) would buy EDP at $700. Looking at the 14 Vortex owners, 8 (57.1%) would buy EDP at $700. Looking at the 10 Digitech looping device owners, five (50%) would buy EDP at $700 Looking at the 21 people who own more than one looping device (other than an EDP), 10 (47.6%) would buy EDP at $700. Looking at the 10 people who own more than two looping devices (other than an EDP), 7 (70.0%) would buy EDP at $700 OK - so I'll try and get the final report to you all ASAP. And if anyone has names and FAX numbers for the Gibson managers in charge of the EDP, please let me know. David Kirkdorffer ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 14 Sep 97 12:07:35 EST From: nm@mail.amsinc.com (ccMail SMTPLINK) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: ccMail SMTPLINK Undeliverable Message Message-Id: <9708148742.AA874264055@mail.amsinc.com> Message undeliverable at this time Original text follows ---------------------------------------------- Received: from ams.amsinc.com by mail.amsinc.com (SMTPLINK V2.11.01) ; Sun, 14 Sep 97 12:07:32 EST Return-Path: Received: from ferret (ferret.slip.net) by ams.amsinc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA16200; Sun, 14 Sep 97 12:13:56 EDT Received: from lists by ferret with local (Exim 1.62 #4) id 0xAHCi-0004PH-00; Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:07:20 -0700 Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 12:06:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199709141606.MAA01269@user1.channel1.com> X-Sender: seahorse@user1.channel1.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com From: Frank Gerace Subject: Re: The EDP Questionnaire -- Update Resent-Message-Id: <"IRaC-C.A.qEE.ytAH0"@ferret> Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/511 Precedence: list Resent-Sender: SmartList Resent-To: Edward_Chang@mail.amsinc.com Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:07:20 -0700 David, Just an amusing side note. On Thursday, when I answered your questionnaire, I said I had one on order as my answer to "would you buy one tomorrow". Well, Friday I got a call from Mr. Music and lo, it was in. So I did buy one tomorrow. Now all I need to do is upgrade the memory. Frank Gerace Dreamchild At 01:42 PM 9/12/97 -0400, you wrote: >Just to let readers know, I've received about 30ish responses to my >off-the-cuff questions. I plan to data into a spread sheet and see what >story emerges. I'll see about getting the raw data out to the list >(minus the names of respondents), so everyone can have a crack at >interpretation. I'm shooting for Monday. > >I will also try to get the results into the hands of folks in Marketing >at Gibson. After we've all had a chance to chew on things a bit... > >So, if you haven't already sent in your responses. I'll keep the door >open until 4:00pm this afternoon. > >Thanks to all of you > >- JamMen, DigiFolk, EvenTiders, Votexians, and Oberpeople. > >David Kirkdorffer > > >Q1 Have you ever seen an Echoplex DP? yes no > > >Q2 Have you ever tried an Echoplex DP? yes no > >Q2a. Would you like to try an Echoplex DP? yes no > > >Q3. Have you tried to find / looked for an Echoplex DP? yes >no > >Q4. Do you currently own an Echoplex DP? yes no >Q4a. How many? > >Q5 Do you currently own other LOOPing tools? yes no >Q5a. Please list the other Loopers you own > > Looper Quantity > Jam Man > Boomerrang > other? (list them!) > >Q6. Do you want to buy an Echoplex DP? yes no > >Q7. If one were available locally to you, would you buy an Echoplex >DP tomorrow? yes no > (Assume retail price w/footpedal approximately = US$700 +/- >10%) > > >Q8; Why do you want to buy an Echoplex DP? > > >Q9. What City, State, and Country are you in? > > >Again, please send your replies ASAP to: dkirkdorffer@exapps.com > > > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 17:59:02 +0200 From: Erik Ljones To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re:EUROplexes( was: looping voice ideas) Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970915175902.00719578@pop.stud.ntnu.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Leonardo wrote: >PS any news for updated EUROplexes??? According to the people at Gibson, back ordered Echoplexes will (quote) "hopefully" be shipped to Europe from USA by the end of this month. This is the same thing they said last month, the month before that, 3 months ago...I wouldn't get my hopes up. I'm sure the demand for Echoplexes is so big in the United States, that by the time they get to think of us European Loopers, there won't be any left. I hope to be proven wrong on this though... Erik (Norway) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 10:51:03 -0700 From: Arthur Gatesy To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Cc: amg@cds9373.Cadence.COM Subject: Echoplex DP Overdub Problem Message-Id: <199709151751.KAA15902@cds9373.Cadence.COM> My echoplex digital pro seems to be stuck in overdub mode - has anyone else seen this problem? The echoplex (about 3 months old) worked fine until a few days ago. After recording a loop, everything else I play ends up as an overdub (without hitting any buttons). I've reset the parameters to the factory defaults and double-checked the OverdubMode parameter, but their settings seem OK. I called Oberheim technical support this morning, and they recommended Wizard Electronics in Atlanta (I'm in northern CA). Has anyone dealt with this place? Thanks, -Art Gatesy ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 14:49:21 -0400 From: "Ott, John" To: "'Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com'" Subject: RE: Torn suggestions Message-ID: >>>>>quote>>>> >Also, I'm under the impression that the music of David Torn is worth >checking out. Could someone please recomend a good starting point? Thanks. > >Erik Ljones (Norway) > > <<< ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 12:08:20 PDT From: "Joseph Buck" To: John_Ott@ATK.COM, Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: RE: Torn suggestions Message-ID: <19970915190820.28260.qmail@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain actually I think What Means Solid, Traveller? crushes everything in its wake.... salam kidlets, buckness >>Also, I'm under the impression that the music of David Torn is worth >>checking out. Could someone please recomend a good starting point? Thanks. >> >>Erik Ljones (Norway) >> >> ><<< >My favorite Torn CD is "Cloud About Mercury" >"Polytown" is good as well. > >> > > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 13:07:38 -0700 (PDT) From: The Man Himself To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: RE: Torn suggestions Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Torn's albums are all quite different, and no two sound very similar. _What Means Solid, Traveller_ is probably the most... well, _most_ overall in terms of the depth and breadth of the music therein. _Cloud About Mercury_ is probably the album he's most widely associated with, and is a close runner-up in my book. _Door X_ generally gets a bad reputation due (mainly) to its song-oriented slant and glossy production, but I actually quite like the record, and it has some of Torn's finest recorded guitar playing on it (IMO). For looping content, I'd say _Traveller_ and its immediate predecessor, _Tripping Over God_, are the best places to look. Looping seems to play a more fundamental role in the compositional aspects of the pieces on these records than in past endeavors. --Andre ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 13:44:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Rik Elswit To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Echoplex DP Overdub Problem Message-Id: <199709152044.NAA20656@well.com> "My echoplex digital pro seems to be stuck in overdub mode - has anyone else seen this problem? The echoplex (about 3 months old) worked fine until a few days ago." Do the functions work properly when you use the panel buttons rather than the footpedal. If so, the problem is in your pedal. I sent my echoplex back to the factory because it was having similar problems. Their response was to hold onto it for three weeks and then send it back when I screamed loud enough. It was still screwed up, but using a friend's pedal shoed me that it was a pedal problem. Rik Elswit Bananas at Large 415-457-7600 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 16:33:10 -0400 From: "Paul J. Dresher" To: "INTERNET:Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com" Subject: Info on Echoplex upgrade availability Message-ID: <199709151633_MC2-208C-D035@compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Echoplex Upgraders: I just spoke with Pat Murphy at Oberheim/Gibson Customer Support in Nashville. Upgrade PROMs appear to be in transit in the move from Oakland back to Nashville. He thought about a week or so. They won't take credit cards so they need a cashiers check or money order made out to Oberheim, $45 per upgrade and mailed to: Gibson Attn: Pat Murphy 1818 Elm Hill Pike Nashville, TN 37210 If anyone knows an easier/quicker way to get the PROMs, please let me know. Paul Dresher ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 14:39:22 -0700 From: Kim Flint To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Cc: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Echoplex DP Overdub Problem Message-Id: <2.2.32.19970915213922.008d62a8@pop.chromatic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" re Arthur's broken overdub problem: My first thought was that you had it in delay mode without realizing, but since you reset the parameters to default, that's not it. You could tell if it is a problem with the footswitch or a front panel button by the LED's on the front panel. If the Overdub LED is red all the time, than overdub is indeed stuck on and one of the switches is a likely culprit. Probably you would have trouble with other switches if that were the case. If the Overdub LED is not red, then you have a different problem. In that case I would suspect that the VCA part has gone bad somehow. That's a likely one actually because the manufacturer of that part recently shipped a whole bunch of faulty components to Oberheim, partly resulting in the most recent production delays. The bad ones were carefully weeded out, so it shouldn't be a problem, but it is possible that a part could be close to the edge and get worse as it ages. It is also possible that corrosion in the socket for the VCA could cause this problem, but it's doubtful in a unit only 3 months old. (I saw that once in a unit that had been in a smoker-inhabited studio for a couple of years) You asked about Wizard electronics...they do contract repair work for many companies in the music industry. I think Oberheim has recently started using them as well. So far as I know they are a competent shop, but I've never dealt with them before. If you send your unit there, point them toward the VCA or the switches. And Rik, welcome to Looper's Delight! kim At 01:44 PM 9/15/97 -0700, Rik Elswit wrote: >"My echoplex digital pro seems to be stuck in overdub mode - >has anyone else seen this problem? The echoplex (about 3 months old) >worked fine until a few days ago." > >Do the functions work properly when you use the panel buttons rather than >the footpedal. If so, the problem is in your pedal. I sent my echoplex >back to the factory because it was having similar problems. Their response >was to hold onto it for three weeks and then send it back when I screamed >loud enough. It was still screwed up, but using a friend's pedal shoed me >that it was a pedal problem. > >Rik Elswit >Bananas at Large >415-457-7600 > > > ________________________________________________________ Kim Flint 408-752-9284 Mpact System Engineering kflint@chromatic.com Chromatic Research http://www.chromatic.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 16:33:47 -0700 From: Arthur Gatesy To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Echoplex DP Overdub Problem Message-Id: <199709152333.QAA16191@cds9373.Cadence.COM> kim and Rik, Thanks very much for your input on my overdub problem. It sounds like the VCA problem, since no LEDS are on. Oh well, off it goes to Atlanta! -Art Gatesy > re Arthur's broken overdub problem: > > My first thought was that you had it in delay mode without realizing, but > since you reset the parameters to default, that's not it. > > You could tell if it is a problem with the footswitch or a front panel > button by the LED's on the front panel. If the Overdub LED is red all the > time, than overdub is indeed stuck on and one of the switches is a likely > culprit. Probably you would have trouble with other switches if that were > the case. > > If the Overdub LED is not red, then you have a different problem. In that > case I would suspect that the VCA part has gone bad somehow. That's a likely > one actually because the manufacturer of that part recently shipped a whole > bunch of faulty components to Oberheim, partly resulting in the most recent > production delays. The bad ones were carefully weeded out, so it shouldn't > be a problem, but it is possible that a part could be close to the edge and > get worse as it ages. It is also possible that corrosion in the socket for > the VCA could cause this problem, but it's doubtful in a unit only 3 months > old. (I saw that once in a unit that had been in a smoker-inhabited studio > for a couple of years) > > You asked about Wizard electronics...they do contract repair work for many > companies in the music industry. I think Oberheim has recently started using > them as well. So far as I know they are a competent shop, but I've never > dealt with them before. If you send your unit there, point them toward the > VCA or the switches. > > And Rik, welcome to Looper's Delight! > > kim > > > At 01:44 PM 9/15/97 -0700, Rik Elswit wrote: > >"My echoplex digital pro seems to be stuck in overdub mode - > >has anyone else seen this problem? The echoplex (about 3 months old) > >worked fine until a few days ago." > > > >Do the functions work properly when you use the panel buttons rather than > >the footpedal. If so, the problem is in your pedal. I sent my echoplex > >back to the factory because it was having similar problems. Their response > >was to hold onto it for three weeks and then send it back when I screamed > >loud enough. It was still screwed up, but using a friend's pedal shoed me > >that it was a pedal problem. > > > >Rik Elswit > >Bananas at Large > >415-457-7600 ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 00:04:58 -0300 From: "The Negative Eye" To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Studio Quad Message-Id: <199709152312.UAA09790@server1.cyberia.net.ar> Content-type: text/plain Hello Loopers, Could anyone tell me the specifications (n¼FX's, I/O,delaytime,etc), of the Digitech Studio Quad ? What's the difference between the "normal" and the V2? I tried to enter digitech's site, but it's framed, and then I cannot retrieve it with email (I don't have online). Thanks a lot in advance, Juan Manuel Aguirre aka ->thE negativE eyE -->negativE visioN --->negativE imagE ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 16 Sep 97 00:12:11 -0000 From: Phil Diem To: Subject: jammidimystery Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Has anyone else had problems brothersyncing two jammen via midi? Yesterday I converted to midi control by connecting a DMC Ground Control (v2.4) to two jammen. I programed the GC to transmit on ch 1 and loaded the presets to send the correct midi program change numbers. When I tap in a loop: 1. sometimes jam #1 starts recording solo and when I tap out #2 starts recording immediately 2. sometimes they both start recording together on the first tap (this is how I expected things to work) 3. sometimes #2 doesn't start recording until the third tap (with #1 layering). There seems to be no predictable pattern and I never know which sequence I'll be dealing with until I get into it. And unfortunately, reset works fine and resets both units simultaneously. Tonight, I unhooked the GC but left the jammen brothersynced, and tried using the lexicon footswitches to control them. Surprise! The lexicon switches didn't work properly either. Tap out required 3-7 taps before recording would stop and the loop would start playing??? I tried switching the sync cable; in to out on #1, and out to in on #2, no change. I tried a different midi cable and still no change. When I went back to no midi cable - unsynced - the lexicon footswitches worked properly. The GC also works fine with either jamman individually. So I don't have a clue as to what's going on, or why. Any helpful suggestions will be very much appreciated! Phil --------------------------------