------------------------------ Loopers-Delight-d Digest Volume 97 : Issue 160 Today's Topics: LiSA from STEIM [ Scot Gresham-Lancaster ] Re: music ---> Mac programs [ "Matt McCabe" ] Re: music [ Sean Echevarria ] The latest about OBERHEIM [ dave stafford ] Re: the rest of the story about OBER [ The Man Himself ] Echoplex upgrade? [ MIvanBerk@aol.com ] Re: Echoplex upgrade? [ Randy Jones ] Looking for software [ William Green ] hologram, means, and ends [ "Joseph Buck" ] Re: the rest of the story about OBER [ Kim Flint ] Re: the rest of the story about OBER [ Kim Flint ] Administrivia: Looper's Delight **************** Please send posts to: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Don't send them to the digest! To subscribe/unsubscribe to the Loopers-Delight digest version, send email with "subscribe" (or "unsubscribe") in both the subject and the body, with no signature files, to: Loopers-Delight-d-request@annihilist.com To subscribe/unsubscribe to the real Loopers-Delight list, send email with "subscribe" (or "unsubscribe") in both the subject and the body, with no signature files, to: Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com Check the web page for archives and lots of other goodies! http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html Your humble list maintainer, Kim Flint kflint@annihilist.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 10:02:42 -0700 From: Scot Gresham-Lancaster To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: LiSA from STEIM Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19970919100242.007bc290@pmail1.csuhayward.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 07:29 PM 9/18/97 -0400, you wrote: >Can anyone reccomend a good sampler/sequencer for the Macintosh? Prehaps even >forward it? > Right now I'm using BackToBasics in union with SoundEffects, and I'm looking >for something with a bit more precision. > Anyone use a Mac at all? > > If you have a PowerMac you might be interested in checking out LiSA developed at the new music center STEIM in Amsterdam http://www.xs4all.nl/~steim/lisa.html LiSa v1.1 (Live Sampling) LiSa (Live Sampling) is a real-time audio manipulation environment that runs on any Macintosh computer with a PowerPC (PPC) processor. The program uses the 16-bit AD/DA converters of these platforms and the computing power of the PPC RISC processor. This combination turns the Mac into a versatile audio sampling machine, able to generate up to 64 voices on a fast PPC604e equipped machine. Complete program control is possible via Midi, thus allowing the user to work with this system in a performance environment. The system contains one big Sample Buffer, and the user defines so called 'Zones' which have access to some part of the sample buffer. A library of Zones can be created (more than two thousand) and each Zone can have six different functions: 1) Playing back the sample buffer's data (start and length as defined by the Zone) in various ways. 2) Recording audio data into the sample buffer (start and length as defined by the Zone) in various ways. 3) Reading a sample file from disk into the sample buffer (start and length as defined by the Zone). 4) Writing part of the sample buffer (start and length as defined by the Zone) as a sample file to disk. 5) Copying data from the 'Output' or 'Process' buffer back to the sample buffer. 6) Reading saved recording data into the sample buffer (start and length as defined by the Zone). Since the user has access to these Zones thru Midi, the top layer of the system is organized as 'Presets', each Preset enables the user to assign the Zones to one or more Midi note events. The program can store up to 128 Presets, whereby each Preset can load a so called 'Preset Image' lll (sample file) into the sample buffer in various ways. Each Preset can have different Zone assignments for each of the 16 Midi channels, so flexibility is the keyword here. LiSa does not try to compete with hardware samplers in terms of ultimate sound quality, no, it tries to compete in terms of flexibility. One of the more important features of LiSa is that at all times the user is able to record new samples in the sample buffer, not only while other Zones are playing, using this part of the sample buffer, but more than one recording Zone may be active, meaning that the samples can be recorded in different parts of the sample buffer simultaneously! To use the program you will need: Any PowerMacintosh computer with System 7.5 or higher OMS or The Apple Midi Manager (driver, manager, patchbay) Sound Manager 3.1 or higher Scot Gresham-Lancaster < Neo-Luddite Technology Victim > ph: 510-885-3150 fax: 885-3461 www: http://tesla.csuhayward.edu/~scot/sglbio.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 10:45:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Rik Elswit To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Echoplex price Message-Id: <199709191745.KAA11088@well.com> Kim, could you pull me off the mailing list for a couple of weeks? I'm taking a vacation, and I'm not taking a computer. (I will, however, be taking my Echoplex, and no, I'm not addicted to it. i could quit anytime I want.) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 10:55:36 -0700 From: "Matt McCabe" To: "Loop" Subject: Re: music ---> Mac programs Message-Id: <199709191753.KAA19920@gw1.bi-tech.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > From: Stephen P. Goodman > It's just that all of the Mac users who regularly get my Loop Of The Week > are using proprietary or non-shareware packages to loop the file. It would > be nice to hear of a package that I could recommend to Mac users, and > perhaps provide a link to as well. Stephen, I use SoundMachine (I think that's the name...it's at home, I'm at work) on the Mac. It will playback WAV and AIFF files and smoothly loop them. I also use another shareware program but I can't remember the name right now. Hope that helps. Matt ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 10:55:28 -0700 From: Sean Echevarria To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: music Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970919105528.00a81410@global.california.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Ok, you've got my atention - any more you can tell us about the Manring project? At 07:36 AM 9/19/97 -0400, Jon Durant wrote: >What am I listening to? Currently I'm only listening to the projects I'm in >the middle of trying to finish: the new Michael Manring CD (due early next >year, and features some v.cool loopage from the bass meister) and a very ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 14:32:08 -0400 From: "Ott, John" To: "'Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com'" Subject: RE: Mac Sequencer Message-ID: >>>>>>>quote>>>>> >From: GILGOOD@aol.com >Reply To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Sent: Thursday, September 18, 1997 6:29 PM >To: John_Ott@ATK.COM >Subject: Re: music > >Can anyone reccomend a good sampler/sequencer for the Macintosh? Prehaps even >forward it? > Right now I'm using BackToBasics in union with SoundEffects, and I'm looking >for something with a bit more precision. > Anyone use a Mac at all? > <<<< end quote <<<< I use Freesytle from Mark Of the Unicorn. Http://www.motu.com you can download a demo version from their site. It is available for both Mac an PC. I use the Mac version. The software has looping possibilities which I have yet to fully explore. They are about to release version 2. any day now. see Web site for details. later >John ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 12:20:56 -0700 From: dave stafford To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: The latest about OBERHEIM Message-ID: <3422D098.C21@tradesvc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit first a disclaimer: I am about two months behind on reading L-D. I scanned the last few digests, and saw no mention of the Obie, so here goes: About FOUR weeks ago, I left a message on some salesman's phone at Oberheim in California asking him what the turnaround time for the upgrade REALLY was, and could I pay an expedite to get it done more quickly. (Like many of you, the thought of having my main creative tool missing for some three to twelve weeks is not a pleasant thought). Of course there were no humans there, and I left a voice mail. About weeks ago a very nice gentleman named Pat Murphy called me from Gibson. He said that the job of returning those calls had not been done by anyone "for a week or so" and apologized for the delay in returning my call. I expressed my frustration at attempting to deal with Oberheim in general (i.e. you can never reach a PERSON, and even if you do leave a message they never return your calls, their turnaround time for repairs is very long etc.). He pretty much agreed with me, and then informed me that I could get the upgrade myself directly from him, as long as I was savvy enough to replace a chip. My logic kicked in, and I figure that for $45.00 even if I messed it up the first time and had to buy a second one, it would only cost $90.00. Compare this to $80.00 and a LONG wait from a company notorious for it's non-responsiveness... Then, however, Pat told me that the chips were "on the way" from California. (Ironic since *I* am *in* California). We discussed how to go about getting me one, and the deal is you must send a MONEY ORDER (read: irretrievable cash instrument, unless you file a mail fraud suit!) directly to him, and then when the chips arrived, he would send one out to me. About TWO weeks ago, I went and mailed the money order to Pat. About TWO days ago, I made a follow-up call to Pat. Again, he was very helpful, and I asked him point blank if the chips had shipped ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 12:37:58 -0700 From: dave stafford To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: the rest of the story about OBERHEIM Message-ID: <3422D496.1B6E@tradesvc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit sorry about that, some strange combination of keystrokes just mailed the incomplete message... where was I? oh yeah ...About TWO days ago, I made a follow-up call to Pat. Again, he was very helpful, he "had my check right in front of him", verified my ship to address etc. I asked him point blank if the chips had shipped from California. He said they would ship "today at the latest". I then asked how long it would take for them to arrive at Gibson. He said "a week or so", so I asked if they were coming on the slow boat. He then made a remarkable statement "they've just finished packing up the whole facility and they are moving it out here". Perhaps you already knew this (I'll bet Kim and Mathias probably did) but it came as a bit of a shock to me! So from what I understand, they are moving Oberheim, lock, stock and barrel right into Gibson's main facility. I remarked to Pat that I would hope that this move would make it easier for Gibson/Oberheim to respond to people's needs, and he claimed that it would make it "much easier". So I am keeping my fingers crossed: that the chips will eventually arrive at Gibson; that they will then turn around and send me one; that it does indeed arrive with clear instructions as promised (Kim- any tips/hints/warnings here??? things to beware of in changing out the chip???) and that I can get it installed without a problem. Any similar experiences here in L-D land? Pat Murphy can be reached at 1-800-4GIBSON X 348. The address to which I sent the money order: GIBSON 1818 Elm Hill Pike Nashville, TN 37210 Let's hope this is a GOOD thing. But I'd say if you are trying to call, fax or email the California office you are probably wasting your time. Thanks! dave at studio seventeen REPLIES TO ambient@adnc.com and/or the list...please. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:09:54 -0700 (PDT) From: The Man Himself To: loopers-delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: the rest of the story about OBERHEIM Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 19 Sep 1997, dave stafford wrote: > Any similar experiences here in L-D land? Indeed. I was just about to post to the list asking for a phone number where I could reach Pat Murphy, since he hasn't yet responded to my last e-mail, which I shall include below in order to best illustrate my current predicament. Thanks very much for the info, Dave. ------ >From altruist@shoko.calarts.eduFri Sep 19 12:58:31 1997 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 11:27:46 -0700 (PDT) From: The Man Himself To: pmurphy@gibson.com Subject: Echoplex status Pat -- It has come to my attention that the Oakland Oberheim offices are closed, and are in the process of moving to the Gibson offices in Nashville. I am extremely curious as to what this means with regards to my Echoplex unit which was being repaired in Oakland, and which, according to you, was to be ready early this week (i.e. right about now, as I write this). Since I was originally informed of a roughly four-week turnaround for the repair work, and since it has now been over eight weeks since I sent in my unit, and since I have already sent you payment for the repair work (which would lead one to believe that the services rendered have been completed), I would appreciate your informing me as to what is going on with my Echoplex. --Andre LaFosse ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:20:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Rik Elswit To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: the rest of the story about OBERHEIM Message-Id: <199709192020.NAA17199@well.com> "Since I was originally informed of a roughly four-week turnaround for the repair work, and since it has now been over eight weeks since I sent in my unit, and since I have already sent you payment for the repair work (which would lead one to believe that the services rendered have been completed), I would appreciate your informing me as to what is going on with my" I don't want to sound like an apologist for Oberheim, but the new regime has spent the last two weeks doing the move and getting set up. They have been very good about getting back to me and staying in communication. When I sent my piece in for repair, I had a similar experience to yours. But I pu all this on the old management. The new management just took over, and they have a lot of cleaning up to do. Rik Elswit ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:45:18 -0700 (PDT) From: The Man Himself To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: the rest of the story about OBERHEIM Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 19 Sep 1997, Rik Elswit wrote: > I don't want to sound like an apologist for Oberheim, but the new regime has > spent the last two weeks doing the move and getting set up. They have been > very good about getting back to me and staying in communication. When I > sent my piece in for repair, I had a similar experience to yours. But I pu > all this on the old management. The new management just took over, and they > have a lot of cleaning up to do. I just got off the phone with Pat Murphy. He asked what the last word had been when he had gotten back to me; I told him that I had not recieved a response from him with regards to my last question. He wondered aloud if he had even recieved the e-mail I had sent him; after searching through his computer he finally found my letter. He remarked that he had thought he'd gotten back to me; after checking, he confirmed my report that he had not. He (of COURSE) confirmed the now widespread news of the Oakland-Gibson transit. He told me that there was a repair team standing by once the move was completed, and that my repair job was in fact at the very top of the list. I then asked him why it was that I had sent a check in to cover repair costs when there had in fact been no repair work yet done, and consequently no way to accurately gauge how much labor would have to be done (and, consequently, how much it might cost). He said that all of their information had come from Mike Lyon in California. I then pointed out that I had been informed (again, by Pat) that my unit was to have been ready earlier this week. Pat's only explanation was that Mike Lyon must have been "lying." I then asked if Mike Lyon's address of mlyon@gibson.com was still vaild, to which Pat replied that Mike Lyon no longer works for Gibson. I sincerely hope that the transition of operations from Oakland to Nashville improves things with regards to Oberheim's customer service. I know I'm not the only one feeling the burn from all of this right now... --Andre ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 14:05:59 -0700 From: "M. Griffin" To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: the rest of the story about OBERHEIM Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970919140557.006f40c4@mail.transport.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >I then asked him why it was that I had sent a check in to cover >repair costs when there had in fact been no repair work yet done, and >consequently no way to accurately gauge how much labor would have to be >done (and, consequently, how much it might cost). He said that all of >their information had come from Mike Lyon in California. I then pointed >out that I had been informed (again, by Pat) that my unit was to have been >ready earlier this week. Pat's only explanation was that Mike Lyon must >have been "lying." > >I then asked if Mike Lyon's address of mlyon@gibson.com was still vaild, >to which Pat replied that Mike Lyon no longer works for Gibson. Just to throw in another non-Echoplex-related Oberheim story, in which Mike Lyon figures... A year or two ago, I ordered a manual for an Oberheim Matrix 1000 synth. Following Mike Lyon's directions, I mailed in my check for $25 (for the thin little spiral-bound book) to his attention. Two months later my check had been cashed, but still no manual. I called him back several times and received no answer, and finally wrote an angry letter addressed to "Oberheim Customer Service" in Oakland. I received a call back from Mike, apologizing for the delay and saying that he had just mailed out the manual that morning. Weeks later, I still hadn't received it. Another round of phone calls, angry faxes and letters, and finally I heard back from Mike Lyons again. He didn't remember ever having talked to me before, but he agreed that three months was a long time to wait for a manual that they had readily available, especially when my check had already been cashed. He promised to send it out right away. When I pointed out that he had already promised this several times, and that I expected he would do better than that, he scoffed and remarked that I was being paranoid. Still later, almost 5 months after my check had been cashed, still no Matrix 1000 manual. This time, I sent out faxes and letters, and left voice mail messages, to a variety of names and departments at Oberheim... no response at all. Finally, by random chance, I saw the email address of someone at Gibson, and thought I'd email them and tell them what had happened, and see if they could help. Though the individual at Gibson who I contacted didn't know me, and had no relation to the Oberheim division, he somehow made sure I received my manual within a few days. I thanked him by email, and asked him what the problem was with this Mike Lyons. He was vague in his response, but indicated that he had heard mumblings of problems in certain departments in Oberheim Oakland. Just seeing that name brought the whole story back. I'll try to forget it again! --Mike mgriffin@hypnos.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H Y P N O S R E C O R D I N G S web site at http://www.HYPNOS.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JEFF GREINKE -- Official Web Site at http://www.hypnos.com/greinke ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 18:04:47 -0400 (EDT) From: MIvanBerk@aol.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Echoplex upgrade? Message-ID: <970919180434_1290818349@emout19.mail.aol.com> Has anybody obtained the Echoplex "v. 5.0" upgrade currently advertised (for $45) on Gibson's website? Positive experiences? Negative experiences? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 19:00:56 -0500 From: Randy Jones To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Echoplex upgrade? Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970919190055.007da1d0@texas.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Could you please provide the URL for the described? Thanks, Randy At 06:04 PM 9/19/97 -0400, you wrote: >Has anybody obtained the Echoplex "v. 5.0" upgrade currently advertised (for >$45) on Gibson's website? Positive experiences? Negative experiences? > > > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 17:53:12 -0700 From: William Green To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Looking for software Message-ID: <34231E78.7A1@worldnet.att.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Does anyone know where I can find a copy of the software program "M" by Intellegent Music for windows? Are there any other windows programs that allow independent midi looping? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 23:34:53 -0400 From: Floyd Miller To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Echoplex upgrade? Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970919233453.0069d0f0@popmail.voicenet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 07:00 PM 9/19/97 -0500, you wrote: >Could you please provide the URL for the described? >Thanks, >Randy > http://www.gibson.net/products/oberheim/LoopUpgrade.html ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 21:01:56 PDT From: "Joseph Buck" To: loopers-delight@annihilist.com Subject: hologram, means, and ends Message-ID: <19970920040157.21720.qmail@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Kim- Your original post had hung in my inbox and although toast on friday night from work i reckon imma gonna chime in. I had joined the delight eons ago for about two weeks when under the weight of some rather trainspotterish gearheadedry i dropped the list... for me all the gear and knobs and whatsits have been a means to an end and not an end in and of itself. i didn't even think the list again until david torn had forwarded on to me (god bless his little heart :)) a posting he had sent here about trying to take the medium outside of its confines... as per usual for dt really thoughtful and thought provoking stuff. So here I am back again. And I'm glad I missed the as you say "who's better guitarists, dj's, or bassoonists" flame fest" that happened...but what I would love to hear is how non guitarists are using these tools when the majority have been made with guitarists in mind...I use my guitar for looping about 10% of the time I would imagine. for me the true joy of looping is that it has allowed me the ability to create what I call "hologram" music which 1. is composed of sounds that are, represent, or will remind people of something and 2.a section of it shows the larger structure.... salam, buck ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 02:41:07 -0700 From: Kim Flint To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Echoplex upgrade? Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 11:34 PM -0400 9/19/97, Floyd Miller wrote: >At 07:00 PM 9/19/97 -0500, you wrote: >>Could you please provide the URL for the described? >>Thanks, >>Randy >> > > http://www.gibson.net/products/oberheim/LoopUpgrade.html The description on the gibson web site is an excessively abridged version of the release notes from Aurisis Research. (developers of Loop, the technology in the plex) I'll be putting the whole thing on the Looper's Delight site this weekend, for those who are interested. It's been posted to the list a couple of times, and I believe it can now be found in the list archives on the website as well. kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@annihilist.com | http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html http://www.annihilist.com/ | Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 00:58:29 -0700 From: Kim Flint To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: the rest of the story about OBERHEIM Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >On Fri, 19 Sep 1997, Rik Elswit wrote: > >> I don't want to sound like an apologist for Oberheim, but the new regime has >> spent the last two weeks doing the move and getting set up. They have been >> very good about getting back to me and staying in communication. When I >> sent my piece in for repair, I had a similar experience to yours. But I pu >> all this on the old management. The new management just took over, and they >> have a lot of cleaning up to do. I've had good experiences with the new folks so far, too. And they do have a lot of work ahead of them. I don't envy the poor guys that have to sort through all the junk packed in the trucks. The seem very motivated, though, and I'm looking forward to working with them. Andre: >He (of COURSE) confirmed the now widespread news of the Oakland-Gibson >transit. He told me that there was a repair team standing by once the >move was completed, and that my repair job was in fact at the very top of >the list. I then asked him why it was that I had sent a check in to cover >repair costs when there had in fact been no repair work yet done, and >consequently no way to accurately gauge how much labor would have to be >done (and, consequently, how much it might cost). He said that all of >their information had come from Mike Lyon in California. I then pointed >out that I had been informed (again, by Pat) that my unit was to have been >ready earlier this week. Pat's only explanation was that Mike Lyon must >have been "lying." heh. Mike didn't actually know about the move until the day it happened. It was one of THOSE kinds of moves for which Gibson is notorious. So he might not have been lying...I had an amusing front row seat, because I happened to stop by OB about two minutes after my old buddy Rik Olsen arrived. Rik used to play guitar in the pop-rock band Berlin, and is now Gibson's director of security. Asset protection, he calls it. Really nice guy, but....during the later days of gwiz we used to sing "Take my Job Away" to the tune of "Take my Breath Away"....ah, it brought back memories of some special moments from the gwiz days..... >I sincerely hope that the transition of operations from Oakland to >Nashville improves things with regards to Oberheim's customer service. I >know I'm not the only one feeling the burn from all of this right now... > >--Andre It looks pretty good so far, hopefully they'll get it right this time. kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@annihilist.com | http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html http://www.annihilist.com/ | Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 02:42:58 -0700 From: Kim Flint To: ambient@adnc.com, Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: the rest of the story about OBERHEIM Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 12:37 PM -0700 9/19/97, dave stafford wrote: >I remarked to Pat that I would hope that this move would make it easier >for Gibson/Oberheim to respond to people's needs, and he claimed that it >would make it "much easier". Well, it would be real hard to make it much worse...:-) >So I am keeping my fingers crossed: that the chips will eventually >arrive at Gibson; that they will then turn around and send me one; that >it does indeed arrive with clear instructions as promised (Kim- any >tips/hints/warnings here??? things to beware of in changing out the >chip???) and that I can get it installed without a problem. It's pretty easy. You get two eprom chips. Take the top off the echoplex to reveal it's innards. (unplug if first! and ground yourself to protect against static.) You'll see two similar chips in sockets. Use a small flathead screwdriver to carefully lift those out. Carefully insert the new chips in the sockets. The PCB is labeled so you'll see which chip goes in which socket. Put the top back on, plug it in. Turn the power on with the parameter button pressed to initialize it, and you're done. kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@annihilist.com | http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html http://www.annihilist.com/ | Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com --------------------------------