------------------------------ Loopers-Delight-d Digest Volume 97 : Issue 213 Today's Topics: Re: Steam-powered looping [ Ken Fletcher ] Re: Power Tools/Nels Cline (not much [ klaw@iglou.com ] RE: On being complete nerds (and lon [ Laurie Hatch ] RE: Bungle Good [ Laurie Hatch ] RE: On being complete nerds (and lon [ Sean Echevarria ] wonder if there is another french pe [ "c.voit" ] effect sends and switchers [ "Julia & Dave" ] Advice for Engineers (please read) [ "Michael P. Hughes, Ph.D." ] Vortex Alert [ klaw@iglou.com ] Re: effect sends and switchers [ "T.W. Hartnett" ] Re: Brainwave Synch [ "Stephen P. Goodman" To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Steam-powered looping Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Hi Jim-- Thank you very much for taking the time to expand on some details of one- and two-deck tape looping. I really appreciate it, and next time I see a decent reel-to-reel deck (to pair with my current one) come available, I'll think twice about passing it up! Since you did give me permission to post your e-mail on the list, I'm gonna do it because others here may find it interesting and helpful. Thanks again! -Ken Fletcher On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, Bailey, Jim wrote: ::: :::I don't know if you've had any other replies besides the one from Bret, but :::I thought I'd mention a few things that might be somewhat useful, having :::worked with both kinds of loops for 20+ years (and still doing so!). ::: :::As for the closed-loop, single deck version, unless you can disable the :::erase head, this is really only good for creating a static loop (i.e. one :::that doesn't change) for a background to other sounds. With the erase head :::disabled, however, you run the risk of sounds building up until they become :::undifferentiated goop. Another major sticking point (literally and :::figuratively), is that splice. It does tend to sepatate after a while, so :::caution should be exercised. ::: :::Regarding the two-deck method: ::: :::(heavy sarcasm mode ON)You want to know about this and DON'T have Eno's :::_Discreet Music_? NAUGHTY, NAUGHTY, NAUGHTY!!! Rectify this situation AT :::ONCE!(heavy sarcasm mode OFF) The reason I mention this, is not only because :::it is one of the best examples of the genre, but also because the liner :::notes contain a diagram of the set-up which is clear enough even on the :::miniaturized CD version. ::: ::: Bret's description was accurate enough, so I won't repeat any of that, :::but one thing to keep in mind is that no two decks will run at the same :::speed (a feature which Steve Reich took advantage of in some of his early :::tape pieces). This means that you will have one of two situations happening :::when the tape is running: If the faster deck is feeding, the tape will sag :::between the decks until there is a large pile on the floor which could cause :::problems later; conversely, if the slower deck is feeding, it could cause :::the tape to stretch (although with most good quality machines this shouldn't :::be a problem - at least I haven't found it so). If you want to get really :::fancy, it is possible to control the speed of one machine so that it matches :::perfectly with the other, although Revox is the only maker I know of who :::provides such an option (outsice of professional machines, of course), which :::is probably one of the main reasons Fripp and Eno used them. The advantage :::of speed matching, besides overcoming the above problems, is that there is :::less distortion of the signal on playback as well as other anomalies which :::seem to sneak in, and so the repetitions are cleaner and can last longer. I :::don't have any of that nifty shit, however, just a couple of Tandbergs, so :::it's a bit tricky, but also gives some wondeous and unexpected results, :::precisely the reason why I prefer this system. ::: Depending on whether the input signal is mono or stereo, one may want to :::swap the channels on the return path to the record deck, so that left goes :::to right and vice versa. This can be especially effective for mono signals, :::and can be done using the pan controls on a mixer, or simply by reversing a :::pair of patch cables. ::: To prove how adaptable the system is, I even did some loops using an :::ultra-cheap Sears portable machine for the playback. Very interesting :::results. As for your concerns about damage to the deck from the :::free-spinning reel, it doesn't seem to have had a noticable effect on my :::machines, although I suppose it could wear out the hub brakes a bit faster :::than normal. My advice? Definitely go for it if you can snag another deck! ::: :::Although I'm sending this to you as personal mail, feel free to post it to :::the list if you like. BTW, sorry about the lack of a formal opening, but I :::realized that I'd forgotten to save your name along with the address. ::: :::Good luck, and happy looping! ::: :::Jim Bailey ::: ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 10:13:24 -0500 From: klaw@iglou.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Power Tools/Nels Cline (not much looping content) Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >klaw@iglou.com wrote: > >> >> Power tools also did continue after Bill left with Pete Cosey( Miles ) >> >>taking filling the big man's shoes . As you can imagine the sound of this >> >>band changed considerably . I think Cosey played abit of G synth along >> >>with some keybrd work. The only recorded document of this line up that I >> >>know of is a live Knitting Factory radio show tape. >> > >Who's got a copy of this? I'm a freak for Pete Cosey's >playing & want to hear as much as I can. Here's what I >know of: >Muddy Waters-Electric Mud >Miles Davis-Agharta, Pangea, Dark Magus, Get Up with It, >En Concert avec Europe1, Call it what it is, Berlin '73, >Another Bitches Brew >Mtume-Rebirth Cycle >Herbie Hancock-Future Shock >I know there was a Howlin' Wolf Electric Wolf album, don't >know if Pete was on it, but I think so. >So is that it? The entire Pete Cosey discography? > >> Actually I believe I do have a copy . Let me see if I can dig it out& >>Ill let you know. K Law ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 12:03:39 -0800 From: Laurie Hatch To: "'Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com'" Subject: RE: On being complete nerds (and longhairs) Message-ID: <01BCF80A.30E35EE0.lahatch@dnai.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paolo said: >Below is my top-ten rotation of CDs in my current listening. It's funny that >just a few years ago, I was under the influence of the UCSD Music Department >in that I snobbishly avoided any music that I or the professors and graduate >students would consider "not innovative/creative enough". It's taken some >time to open my mind and not be ashamed of liking the music I like. :) Good for you! Yeah, too bad about much of music academia: self confidence in one's musical autonomy is constructed and deconstructed at the same time. But that's another discussion... Great list! >...8. Modest Mussorgsky - Pictures At An Exhibition >Not much to say about this classic. ... Allow me: (The following is a peripheral-to-the-topic, Sunday morning introspection, but I do eventually get around to looping. It is not nearly as, shall we say, stimulating as a Butt Looper!) Pictures: I'm curious if you have a fave performance, Paolo - there are so many. Although I do enjoy the orchestral recordings, I'm partial to Mussorgsky's original score for solo piano. (Loren Hollander's version is exceptionally dynamic and expressive, but unfortunately out of print.) IMHO, Ravel's orchestration was an extraordinary accomplishment, but I almost think something was lost - the original piano score's unadorned elegance and starkness are less evident in more texturally complex orchestral renditions. (Some critics are even less charitable about Ravel's effort, bless 'em. Hey, each to his/her own! Would that our respective talents were all as generously endowed as Ravel's! ...Hmmm, that didn't sound quite right...) So what does this have to do with looping? Well, it got me to thinking what Ravel might have done with an electronically enhanced orchestra and looping devices/instruments. Or Mussorgsky, for that matter. Although for me, in this case, MM's composition and choice of instrument virtually define each other. Anyway, seems like it would have been pretty cool. (Remember Emerson, Lake, and Palmer's version? Took a lot of b-, uh, guts to tread in MM's enormous footprints. I lost that album, the vinyl kind, in a move long ago. It's reissued on CD. Wonder how it has stood the test of time?) This brings up the related thread about compositional approach and inspiration, to which I'd like to add: The differences between MM's original, and Ravel's interpretation (independent of one's personal preference or opinion) are excellent examples of the challenge that all musicians face. We continually make decisions, consciously and unconsciously, about the validity/necessity/success of each component and layer in our "audio collages" (yeah, great description). For us modern loopers, the relative profusion of tools that allows us to easily build incredibly dense, multi-layered sounds can be both a blessing and a curse. It is tempting to add more and more, because it's fun, and it's easy! However, we must be careful not to suffocate the unaffected freshness, vitality, --rawness!-- that illuminate our expressions. That's what inspired us to create them in the first place. laurie ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 12:05:09 -0800 From: Laurie Hatch To: "'Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com'" Subject: RE: Bungle Good Message-ID: <01BCF80A.33580860.lahatch@dnai.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jamie said: >I would like to unanimously agree with Kim's post about Mr Bungle. Ditto that. >Fortunately, I saw them in brisbane a year ago, and the show was crowded, but >not a total sellout. (Who would have thought living in Brisbane would have it's >perks...) >The crowd was a diverse sample to say the least. I can only imagine. Even put Berkeley's best to shame, no doubt. (For anyone unfamiliar with its cultural geography, "Berserkeley" prides itself on exploring all the options.) >In a strange way Mr Bungle are at the same time the antithesis of music and the >icon of music. Perceptive statement. I only heard the first three cuts from Disco Volante, but these guys don't waste any time letting you know that you're in for a ride. Not exactly elevator music. If it was, the suspension cable would have to be a bungee cord! (Hey, how about "Elastic" mode on a looping device? Temporal disequalizer, cc pedal? Has this been done?) >Also, like a lot of loopers around the place, they use a lot of interesting >techniques to get their sound. >The mix of sound I experienced at the Bungle concert was so clear, that I could >hear every nuance from every musician. Not a small feat considering what they >played and how often they do a musical about-face. That really is amazing. These guys have lotz 'o chopz, ignited by intense energy. Sort of Ornette Coleman, The Next Generation. laurie ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 13:08:24 -0800 From: Sean Echevarria To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: RE: On being complete nerds (and longhairs) Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19971123130824.0092f380@global.california.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Or Mekong Delta's version? Interesting bunch of guys that never properly attributed much of the work they released as their own. At 12:03 PM 11/23/97 -0800, you wrote: >>...8. Modest Mussorgsky - Pictures At An Exhibition > >>Not much to say about this classic. ... > >Allow me: > [snip] >devices/instruments. Or Mussorgsky, for that matter. Although for me, in this >case, MM's composition and choice of instrument virtually define each other. > Anyway, seems like it would have been pretty cool. (Remember Emerson, Lake, >and Palmer's version? Took a lot of b-, uh, guts to tread in MM's enormous >footprints. I lost that album, the vinyl kind, in a move long ago. It's >reissued on CD. Wonder how it has stood the test of time?) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 00:11:02 +0100 From: hovard@online.no To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Say it out loud , I`m a geek and... Message-Id: <3.0.32.19971124001100.006a41c4@online.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Thomas: > >I went through the same thing, 'cept it was my girlfriend, not my tape >delay. Your poignant narrative makes my experience seem shallow by >comparison ;) > >" A Boy and his Roland". Tonight, I'll say a little prayer for you, man. > >drone on~~~~~~~~~~Tom >Tom Lambrecht hideo@concentric.net > Hey Tom! Good to see someone understanding the tragedy of all this. So show me some respect , I know what pain is! :) I`ll let you know when I`m fully restored and on my feet....... Thomas > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 00:11:17 +0100 From: hovard@online.no To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Nels Cline Message-Id: <3.0.32.19971124001116.0068ce78@online.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hey ,everybody who followed the little tread about Niels Cline ; I was over at Guitar Player online and checked out what the next issue contained , and whaddya know , "Niels Cline details the life of a double method guitarist" (?). I can`t wait to read it......Now if I could just locate a cd of him here in No(r)way........ Thomas ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 10:53:16 +0000 From: malhomme To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V97 #212 Message-ID: <34795C9A.275F@infobiogen.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit " Any loopers or other fingerstyle guitarist/jazz players in city of Paris, France that I could connect with November 26-December 1, 1997?" Ah. You hit me in my soft spot... Loopers in france... Geee. I wonder if more than 3 persons have bought jammen, and probably, the EDP has never seen the french skies... They are a few persons make loop oriented muisc taht I know in my area, butit is 200 Km from Paris. None performs loop music, they do it mostly at home with old limited toys... As for Jazz playing, there are plenty plenty plenty. If they are to be catched by you (I know nothing of touring schedule) try to find N'Guyen Le, Marc Ducret... There are places that have concerts all week long like the "New Morning". I'll check for more... Olivier Malhomme Besides I wonder if there is another french person here... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 12:02:54 +0100 From: "c.voit" To: Loopers-Delight Subject: wonder if there is another french person here... Message-ID: <34795EDE.858E3E17@vtx.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit salut a tous amateurs de boucles de plaisirs wouln't the list be more colourful if the greetings were done in our mother tongue ALABIENTOT Claude ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 08:42:57 -0500 From: "Julia & Dave" To: "Looper's Delight" Subject: effect sends and switchers Message-Id: <199711241335.IAA20966@mail.colba.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I'm only a couple hours away from picking up a Delta Lab DL-1 delay, , DL-5 Harmonicomputer and a Digitech RDS-4000 Time Machine. I'm also down to one effect send on my mixer and since I refuse to use patchbays (I'm patching modular synth equipment non-stop so I really don't need further worries.), I'm curious to know how the guitar loopers out there cope with this situation. I'm sure there are a few of you out there with more than two loopers.. I've never used switching systems, but I think they could be useful in this case. Any tips? TIA, D 4 V 1 D K R 1 5 T 1 4 N jndk@colba.net http://www.total.net/~alien8/Kristian.html P.S. I wish someone would make a small mixer WITHOUT mike inputs for once and give more than two or three sends. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 15:37:31 From: "Michael P. Hughes, Ph.D." To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Advice for Engineers (please read) Message-Id: <3.0.1.16.19971124153731.263761e6@rank-serv.elec.gla.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 12:02 PM 11/24/97 +0100, Claude wrote: >wouln't the list be more colourful if the greetings were done in our >mother tongue Bore Da, Pawb*! I'm currently mentoring a group of 1st-year students on the Electronics With Music degree. Obviously they'd all like to get jobs in the music electronics industry, and I've been giving what limited advice I can. Then it occured to me that on this list we have so many people in the music tech field - people working at Lex and Oberheim, entrepreneurs like Motley and freelancers like Matthias and Kim. So to all you guys out there, I'd be _really_ grateful if you could spend a couple of minutes to send me some advice/encouragement/grim hard truth to pass on to these guys. I'd really appreciate it. Thanks all! Iawn*, Michael * Welsh, BTW ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 16:25:33 GMT From: pycraft@elec.gla.ac.uk (Michael Pycraft Hughes, PhD) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: andy summers show... Message-Id: <14943.199711241625@rank-serv.elec.gla.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Andre: >if ANDY Summers is coming to your town on his short (20-25 date) tour of US >east & west coasts - do go see him - i just saw the (moderately attended) >wetlands NYC show - first of the tour, and it rocked - or actually, it >jazzed - Andy's playing a ton of standards, and standards-ish material - his >new CD with Tony Levin, Gregg Bissonette is awesome, if you like jazz guitar >with balls and modern tones.... the cd also features on one cut, Bernie >Dresel(dr) and Jerry Watts (bs) who are his fine touring band.... It's funny, but the most recent Andy Summers material fails to excite me the way his Police / XYZ stuff did. It's as if he's become _too_ competent - his older playing always sounded as if he was fighting to find the next note, a sense of tension and playing on the edge of his ability (Steve Howe gives the same impression to me) where no-one knows how anything will turn out. His more recent stuff seems so slick it's heading towards more generic fusion. His "new age" release "Mysterious Barricades" is still a big influence on my playing (probably more than Fripp, whost style he seems to imitate on this album)... Comments anyone? Michael ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 08:56:27 -0800 From: "Matt McCabe" To: Subject: Re: andy summers show... Message-Id: <199711241648.IAA28489@gw1.bi-tech.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > From: Michael Pycraft Hughes, PhD > It's funny, but the most recent Andy Summers material fails to excite me > the way his Police / XYZ stuff did. It's as if he's become _too_ competent I would agree. I've purchased every one of his solo albums and end up wondering why. Although, there is always one song I like on each disc. XYZ had some high points...but he should have found a singer. The first cut off of "The Golden Wire" is a still one of my personal favorites. > - his older playing always sounded as if he was fighting to find the next > note, a sense of tension and playing on the edge of his ability (Steve Howe > gives the same impression to me) where no-one knows how anything will turn > out. His more recent stuff seems so slick it's heading towards more IMO, this most innovative work was with the Police...BUT....his tone and (subtle) use of effects is just as good today. I'm not a huge fan of jazz so his solo albums are a little harder for me to digest....and I can't help but wonder what would happen if he used a little more of his rock vocabulary in this writing. But, his approach to guitar and melody are still unique and interesting. I particularly like the way he slides off of notes and his warm, smooth, sustaining lead tone. > Comments anyone? I was glad to see that David H..? was not involved in the production of "The Last Dance of Mr. X." His cheesy keyboard sounds really bugged me!! Matt ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 11:56:49 -0500 From: klaw@iglou.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Vortex Alert Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Monday Nov 24 . 4 Vortexes in stock -$235ea>>>>>>>Warehouse >>Louisville Ky (502)-456 -4730 . These are new in box units w footswitch manual etc.Music Warehouse> Louisville Ky 502 -456- 4730 Open til 10 pm today. K Law ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 97 10:42:17 -0000 From: "T.W. Hartnett" To: "Looper's Delight" Subject: Re: effect sends and switchers Message-Id: <199711241638.IAA23902@scv2.apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" >I'm also down to one effect send on my mixer and since I refuse to use >patchbays (I'm patching modular synth equipment non-stop so I really don't >need further worries.), I'm curious to know how the guitar loopers out >there >cope with this situation. I'm sure there are a few of you out there with >more >than two loopers.. What I do is take the stereo outs from my guitar preamp, and run one into a Digitech 3.6 sec delay. It has three outs, mix, dry, and inverted mix. The mix is set to 100% wet and sent to one channel of my mixer. The dry is sent to another channel. The other preamp out feeds a DOD 8second delay pedal, set to 100% wet going to a third channel. Effects send 1 on my mixer feeds an Echoplex, which returns not to effects return, but to a fourth channel. Effects send 2 goes to a Vortex. This setup doesn't allow me to send anything to any other possible destination, but in practice I haven't found the need for that. However, in the brand new Guitar Player, I saw notice of a 1-in/8-out splitter called the Studio Ho, which I'll be purchasing ASAP (lists for $179). With my current setup, levels can fluctuate depending on whether or not one of the delays is active, and I'm sure it's a horrible set of mismatchs, but it works for now. Once I get the Studio Ho, which is completely buffered, I'll send the out from the preamp to that, and use that to feed the delays. This will also allow me to add more delays and hopefully a second Vortex. Travis Hartnett ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 18:45:39 From: "Michael P. Hughes, Ph.D." To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: andy summers show... Message-Id: <3.0.1.16.19971124184539.28c7a276@rank-serv.elec.gla.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> From: Michael Pycraft Hughes, PhD > >> It's funny, but the most recent Andy Summers material fails to excite me >> the way his Police / XYZ stuff did. It's as if he's become _too_ >competent > >I would agree. I've purchased every one of his solo albums and end up >wondering why. Not a good sign! > Although, there is always one song I like on each disc. >XYZ had some high points...but he should have found a singer. The first >cut off of "The Golden Wire" is a still one of my personal favorites. I really like XYZ - and whilst he can't sing on the whole, he deadpans some tracks quite well. I'm disappointed this album seems to have been "buried" as a bad job - I certainly an't find CD reissues about... >IMO, this most innovative work was with the Police...BUT....his tone and >(subtle) use of effects is just as good today. I'm not a huge fan of jazz >so his solo albums are a little harder for me to digest....and I can't help >but wonder what would happen if he used a little more of his rock >vocabulary in this writing. But, his approach to guitar and melody are >still unique and interesting. I particularly like the way he slides off of >notes and his warm, smooth, sustaining lead tone. Ever since buying Charming Snakes (I think it was - does that have him playing a Klien in a rather -ahem - unusual manner on the back?) I've beent trying to figure out who it soundslike he's been listening to, and it's struck me now - he sounds more like a cross between Andy Summers and Larry Carlton (with maybe a dash of Holdsworth or Vai)... a pity, since he seems to be diluting his style as his technique has improved. Practising, kids - just say no. Michael ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 18:47:14 From: "Michael P. Hughes, Ph.D." To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Vortex Alert Message-Id: <3.0.1.16.19971124184714.376f7f82@rank-serv.elec.gla.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 11:56 AM 11/24/97 -0500, you wrote: > Monday Nov 24 . 4 Vortexes in stock -$235ea>>>>>>>Warehouse >>Louisville >Ky (502)-456 -4730 . These are new in box units w footswitch manual >etc.Music Warehouse> Louisville Ky 502 -456- 4730 Open til 10 pm today. Just to let Brit loopers know, they have some in Turnkey at 199-00 stirling. They advertise in Sound on Sound, etc. 7 left, last I heard. Michael ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 12:33:38 -0500 From: Len Seligman To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Vortex Alert Message-Id: <3.0.2.32.19971124123338.006e22c0@dharma.mitre.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 11:56 AM 11/24/97 -0500, you wrote: > Monday Nov 24 . 4 Vortexes in stock -$235ea>>>>>>>Warehouse >>Louisville >Ky (502)-456 -4730 . These are new in box units w footswitch manual >etc.Music Warehouse> Louisville Ky 502 -456- 4730 Open til 10 pm today. > I just got one of them. The guy said they were really $299, but he "let it go" for $250 plus shipping. -Len ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 09:43:58 -0800 From: "Stephen P. Goodman" To: Subject: Re: Brainwave Synch Message-ID: <01bcf900$8b1ed0a0$e33bd4cc@CIS.compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I've never used it, but apparently CoolEdit has wave generation on that level.. Anyone tried using it? Stephen Goodman * http://www.earthlight.net/Studios EarthLight Productions * Get the Loop Of The Week Free! --------------------------------